When Ubuntu 10.04 LTS was released, the distro dons a new look which is refreshing and elegant, moving from dull brown to more vibrant colors. It is also surprisingly stable for a Linux distro. Now, with 11.04, another big change is applied; the Unity interface. It differs so much compared to the GTK 2.x interface that has been a staple of Ubuntu, the community is split into two distinct groups. Those who love it, and those who don't. I, for one, do love it.
OH SNAP!
Unity also adds a new feature known to Windows users as Aero Snap. Drag a window to the top of the screen and it will maximize. Drag them to the either side of the screen and it fills half the screen. Handy for multitasking or transferring files. Before Unity, Aero Snap can be accomplished in Ubuntu via Compiz, but it's fairly clumsy to work with.
Unity Dislikes Third Party Themes
While Unity can be themed just like GTK 2.x, it appears that buttons are a bit of an issue.
These aren't the buttons we're looking for |
Dude, Where's My Scro- Oh.
Not exactly limited to Unity (also applied to the classic GNOME desktop), most of the scrollbars are now reduced to what seems to be a single colored line. Until you put your cursor on it.
Peek-a-boo! |
Dashing.
That button on the left side of the top panel opens Dash, which is something Windows users might compare it to the Start menu.
Now with a searchbox! |
Personally, I wish more customizations are available for Unity Dash, such as adjusting the icon size, changing the number of rows and columns, hide "Apps available to download" section, always let it open fullscreen, and perhaps some other stuff I missed.
I've heard about Unity Lens, which seems interesting but isn't applied by default. Using the exact same interface as above, you can search for *cough*Rebecca Black*cough* on Youtube, without opening Firefox or any other browser. You can see some of the few Lenses in development here.
Finally.
To end my relatively long post today, I'd say that Unity is good enough for daily use, provided you spend enough time to familiarize with it. It still needs some improvements, especially in terms of usability and customizations, so we'll see what Unity matures into.
Also, Unity is very similar to the recently released GNOME 3. Heck, I don't know who copied who, but at least we have options.
Unity is actually based on GNOME 2. Sure, they might look similar, but different. Take note that most of Unity's UI lie on the desktop parts, not the GTK+ widgets and window borders. GNOME 3 covers far much more than that.
ReplyDeleteIt'll be only a matter of time before Canonical attempts to integrate GNOME 3 into Canonical.
Actually, GNOME 3 will be integrated into Ubuntu 11.10. It's official.
ReplyDeleteWhich brings me to another case: Will Unity be ditched or modified to suit GNOME 3?
Also, why would Canonical wants to integrate GNOME 3 into CANONICAL? :3
Yes. I'm just stating that and I pretty much know GNOME 3 will be in 11.10, but from what I heard it'll not be the default interface. It'll be optional and installable from the repositories. Something like that
ReplyDelete... Looks like I made a typo there, ignore that.
What I meant was "It'll be only a matter of time before Canonical attempt to integrate GNOME 3 into UNITY." There.